What do religious texts say about science and religion?
Something extraordinary is happening across these texts: the oldest of human institutions — religion — is insisting, in its own voice, that it must answer to evidence. The Bahá'í writings say it with remarkable directness, and the Buddha's Kalama Sutta says it from a different angle entirely: trust your own mind before you trust any teacher. These are not grudging concessions to modernity; they are ancient and principled commitments to the examined life.
Must religion agree with reason and empirical findings?
The Bahá'í texts are unambiguous: religion that contradicts science is simply ignorance dressed in sacred language. That bluntness is rare in religious literature, and worth sitting with.
Religion must conform to science and reason.
Religion unreasonable by scientific standards is mere superstition.
God-given reason demands religion accord with scientific principles.
What role does independent inquiry play in spiritual life?
Both Bahá'í and Buddhist sources insist that blind acceptance — even of one's own tradition — is a failure of the spiritual life. The examined belief, not the inherited one, is what these texts honour.
Free, independent inquiry is the foundation of spiritual life.
Inherited belief without personal investigation leads the soul astray.
Students must actively correlate faith with philosophy and science.
The Buddha forbids intellectual submission even to his own authority.
Personal intelligence, not received teaching, is the Buddha's standard.
Do faith and empirical discovery ultimately converge?
Several passages argue that apparent contradictions between scripture and science dissolve under careful investigation — that time vindicates both. It is a bold claim, and these texts make it without flinching.
Science and religion mutually sustain and explain each other.
Patient investigation vindicates both scripture and corrected science.
India's tradition treats religion and science as a unified inquiry.
What do sacred texts teach about the age and origin of the cosmos?
Only one tradition appears here, but it speaks plainly: the world is of very great antiquity, and scripture need not resist that finding. A single specimen, clearly observed.
Scripture supports the world's great age, not a short one.
Ancient texts encode a cosmos of immense, pre-human age.
Is the pursuit of knowledge a sacred duty or a secular distraction?
Science is described not as a rival to religion but as one of its two wings — and a wing that has failed to fly without the other. The image is striking precisely because it refuses to rank them.
Science and religion are equal, necessary partners for human progress.
Religion and science are equal, inseparable wings of human flight.
Humanity cannot advance on religion or science alone.