What are the Zoroastrian teachings on good and evil?
Evil is one of the oldest questions a mind can ask — not just what it is, but whether it could exist without good standing opposite it. The Taoist texts say no: good and evil are twins, each summoning the other into being the moment it is named. Jewish mysticism goes further, suggesting the evil impulse is not a permanent feature of the cosmos but a scaffolding, necessary only for this age of the world and fated to be dismantled.
Do good and evil require each other to exist?
The Taoist texts make a startling observation: good and evil are not independent realities but relational ones, each called into being by the other's existence. The Kabbalistic tradition adds a wrinkle — this mutual dependency may be a feature of time itself, not of ultimate reality.
Good and evil are mutually constituted, not independent realities.
Opposites including good and evil are inseparable and ultimately undivided.
Good is known only through contrast with its opposite.
What is the origin and ultimate fate of the evil impulse?
Jewish mystical teaching here is precise and striking: the evil inclination is not an eternal fixture of reality but a temporary necessity, required only for the duration of this world's six millennia — after which it ceases to be needed.
Evil is a temporary necessity of this world's age, not an eternal reality.