What are the Zoroastrian teachings on good and evil?

Evil is one of the oldest questions a mind can ask — not just what it is, but whether it could exist without good standing opposite it. The Taoist texts say no: good and evil are twins, each summoning the other into being the moment it is named. Jewish mysticism goes further, suggesting the evil impulse is not a permanent feature of the cosmos but a scaffolding, necessary only for this age of the world and fated to be dismantled.

Drawn from 4 passages across Tao, Judaism

Do good and evil require each other to exist?

The Taoist texts make a startling observation: good and evil are not independent realities but relational ones, each called into being by the other's existence. The Kabbalistic tradition adds a wrinkle — this mutual dependency may be a feature of time itself, not of ultimate reality.

What is the origin and ultimate fate of the evil impulse?

Jewish mystical teaching here is precise and striking: the evil inclination is not an eternal fixture of reality but a temporary necessity, required only for the duration of this world's six millennia — after which it ceases to be needed.

Judaism

Evil is a temporary necessity of this world's age, not an eternal reality.